CONGRESS ABSTRACT

Papillary fibroelastomas are small and pedunculated left side valves associated mass, that frequently causing cerebral embolization; they are composed of collagen and elastic fibers and are usually connected with a pedicle to the endocardial layer. Differential diagnosis with endocarditis can rely on the side of attachement: Papillary fibroelastomas are more frequently found downstream the valves, instead, endocarditis are mostly found upstream the valves. They are mostly located (>80%) on valvular surfaces, more commonly on left side cardiac valves (44% on the aortic valve and 35% on the mitral valve); therefore, in the present knowledge, papillary fibroelastomas arising from left ventricular myiocardial wall are rare and mostly anecdotally descripted. We present the case of a 78-year-old man, diabetic, with no cardiac history, hospitalized with a right capsulo-lenticular stroke. Symptomatic due to left hemiparesis, he did not undergo thrombolysis due to a delay in hospitalization of almost 24 hours. The transthoracic and then transesophageal echocardiogram showed the presence of a hyperechogenic, floating mass of approximately 3 cm at the level of the left ventricle, separate from the mitral valve and attached to the mid-distal anterior septum and the ventricular apex (Figure 1). Cardiac MRI confirmed the presence of a peduncolate left ventricular mass, isointense on cine sequences, without myocardial infiltration, isointense on T1-weighted images and mildy hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with mild uniform late-gadolinium enhancement.(Figure 2). The patient underwent surgical removal of the mass: histological analysis showed multiple, branching fronds of paucicellular, avascular fibroelastic tissue lined by a single layer of endocardium, with positive stains at Weigert coloration for elastic fibers (Figure 3). Histomorphological analysis was compatible with papillary fibroelastoma. This is a very atypical case of papillary fibroelastoma, due to the large size of the mass and the intraventricular and not-valvular location, which determined its emboligenicity and which, if not removed, would have exposed the patient to an enormous risk of recurrence of stroke