Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri

CONGRESS ABSTRACT

CONGRESS ABSTRACT

INTRAVENOUS CANGRELOR INFUSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING COMPLEX VERSUS NON-COMPLEX PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE ICARUS REGISTRY

Scalamera Riccardo Genova (Genova) – Dipartimento Di Medicina Interna (Dimi), Università Di Genova | Benenati Stefano Genova (Genova) – Dipartimento Di Medicina Interna (Dimi), Università Di Genova | Gragnano Felice Caserta (Caserta) – Dipartimento Di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università Degli Studi Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”; Divisione Di Cardiologia, Dipartimento Cardio-Vascolare, Aorn “Sant’Anna E San Sebastiano” | Schettino Matteo Genova (Genova) – Dipartimento Di Medicina Interna (Dimi), Università Di Genova | Bertero Edoardo Genova (Genova) – Dipartimento Di Medicina Interna (Dimi), Università Di Genova | Capolongo Antonio Caserta (Caserta) – Dipartimento Di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università Degli Studi Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”; Divisione Di Cardiologia, Dipartimento Cardio-Vascolare, Aorn “Sant’Anna E San Sebastiano” | De Sio Vincenzo Caserta (Caserta) – Dipartimento Di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università Degli Studi Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”; Divisione Di Cardiologia, Dipartimento Cardio-Vascolare, Aorn “Sant’Anna E San Sebastiano” | Musumeci Giuseppe Torino (Torino) – Dipartimento Di Cardiologia, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Ospedale Umberto I | Annibali Gianmarco Torino (Torino) – Dipartimento Di Cardiologia, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Ospedale Umberto I | Campagnuolo Salvatore Torino (Torino) – Dipartimento Di Cardiologia, Aou Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino | Galasso Gennaro Baronissi (Salerno) – Dipartimento Di Medicina, Chirurgia E Odontoiatria, Università Di Salerno | Silverio Angelo Baronissi (Salerno) – Dipartimento Di Medicina, Chirurgia E Odontoiatria, Università Di Salerno | Bellino Michele Baronissi (Salerno) – Dipartimento Di Medicina, Chirurgia E Odontoiatria, Università Di Salerno | Centore Mario Baronissi (Salerno) – Dipartimento Di Medicina, Chirurgia E Odontoiatria, Università Di Salerno | Menozzi Alberto La Spezia (La Spezia) – S.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Asl5 Liguria | Caretta Giorgio La Spezia (La Spezia) – S.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Asl5 Liguria | Rezzaghi Marco La Spezia (La Spezia) – S.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Asl5 Liguria | De Luca Leonardo Roma (Roma) – Dip. Scienze Cardio-Toraco-Vascolari, Uo Cardiologia, San Camillo-Forlanini | Veneziano Francesco Antonio Roma (Roma) – Università Campus Biomedico | De Nardo Davide Roma (Roma) – Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata

Aims: To compare the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with peri-procedural use of cangrelor.

Methods: Consecutive patients treated with cangrelor in 6 Italian institutions were retrospectively enrolled in the ICARUS (“Intravenous CAngrelor in high-bleeding Risk patients Undergoing percutaneouS coronary intervention”, NCT05505591) registry. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, or chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, at 48 hours. Secondary endpoints were assessed at 48 hours and throughout the hospital stay.

Results: Among 551 patients enrolled in the ICARUS registry and undergoing PCI between January 2019 and August 2022, a total of 534 (97%) patients  had complete information on PCI complexity, of whom 173 (32%) underwent complex PCI and 361 (68%) underwent non-complex PCI. In general, patients with complex PCI had similar clinical features compared with non-complex PCI patients, including comparable prevalence of high bleeding risk (HBR) status according to the ARC-HBR definition (35% vs. 30%, p=0.253), but complex PCI patients presented more often with cardiogenic shock (9% vs. 2%, p<0.001). PCI with ≥3 stents implanted was the most frequent criterion of procedural complexity (62%). The incidence of the primary endpoint of 48-hour NACE (10% vs. 7%, p=0.264) and other clinical endpoints occurring at 48 hours or during hospitalization did not differ between complex and non-complex PCI patients.

Conclusions: Among patients receiving peri-procedural cangrelor, about 30% of cases underwent complex interventions. Notwithstanding higher procedural complexity, short-term clinical outcomes were similar between complex and non-complex PCI patients.